Slider by IWEBIX

An Explanation as to Why Those Caskets Are Floating in the Louisiana Flood

Via ABC News: Casket floating in Ascension Parish, Louisiana

Via ABC News: Casket floating in Ascension Parish, Louisiana

You’ve probably seen those utterly disturbing pictures of caskets floating downstream from the Louisiana Flood.

It’s horrible.  The stuff of nightmares.

You probably have some questions:

Why do they float?

Can those bodies be easily identified?

Shouldn’t the vaults keep them contained in the ground?

To the first question.

There are a couple of kinds of caskets.  There are wood and metal caskets.  Within the metals, there are sealing caskets (also known as gasketed or protective) and non-sealing caskets.  Sealing caskets have a rubber gasket that creates an airtight seal when the sliding lock bar is cranked shut with the casket key.  You may have seen funeral directors use said key after the lid is closed at a funeral.  We insert it into a small crank hole at the foot end of the casket and turn it until the lock bar is totally tight.

Sealing caskets are the only ones that will float.  Even though you would think a wood casket would float, because wood caskets don’t seal, they’re more likely to fill up with water and stay put in their vault.

Can those caskets and the bodies contained in them be identified?    

Most sealing caskets have what’s called a “memory tube.”  You can see where that tube is located in the picture below.

louisiana flood caskets - Google SearchIf the funeral home filled out the memory tube, the process of identification is a whole lot easier.  If the casket doesn’t have a memory tube, the process becomes much more complex.  Although I’m not certain, I can imagine that DNA testing would be the last resort.

Shouldn’t the vaults keep them contained in the ground?

Most cemeteries require vaults (a requirement that I disagree with, but that’s another blog post).  Vaults, like caskets, can either be the sealing type or the non-sealing type.  When the ground becomes over-saturated with water, the sealing vaults can pop out of the ground, causing the vault and the casket it contains to float away (see the picture below).

Photo by PAUL BOWERS

Photo by PAUL BOWERS

More often than not, it’s just the casket that floats away.  In the case of the Louisiana Flooding, the vaults are exposed above ground (I would only assume it’s because there’s a high water table in these parts of the country).  If the vault was buried underground as is the case in most cemeteries, it’s less likely that the caskets would pop out.  But, since they’re that much closer to the top, it’s that much easier for them to stroll down the river when the flood waters come a rolling.

If you don’t want to go boating and floating after you’re dead, there are a few things you can do to make sure your body never washes away:

  1. Cremation
  2. Green burial
  3. Don’t use a sealing casket
  4. Tie your vault to an anchor.

Healed By Grief

The following guest post is written by Alise Chaffins:

EGCover Final

A popular television show that ran during my formative years was Roseanne. It detailed the everyday life of a blue collar family trying to make it in the world. I watched the show, but it never fully resonated with me because I had a hard time believing that one family could encounter one bad experience after another. Surely at some point they would catch a break? It just felt a little unrealistic to me, watching with all of the wisdom of a high school student. No one has that many bad things happen to them.

For a long time, that was true. My life moved along with the kinds of ups and downs that you expect from life. Not free from pain, but certainly not categorized by pain.

Then from 2013-2014, everything in my life fell apart. My mom was diagnosed with ALS and passed away just 11 months later. I had an affair which ended my 16 year marriage. I got pregnant before my divorce was even final, and then suffered a stillbirth at almost 36 weeks of pregnancy. My oldest child came out as transgender and because we supported him, we were asked to leave our church.

Every time I felt like things were beginning to turn around, every time I felt like I was getting a handle on my life, something else would cause me to lose my grip. By August of 2014, I felt like I was drowning in grief.

I tried to ignore it. I tried to fight it, but as I did, the more that I discovered that I was consumed by it. There was no escaping grief, it went with me no matter where I was. Fighting might leave me with a temporary reprieve, but more often than not, it simply left me more exhausted than I already was.

Rather than ignoring or fighting, I began to realize that I had to be willing to experience my grief more fully in order to move through it. I had to find the places where hurt threatened to choke me and dig into them. Instead of looking to be healed from grief, I began to look for ways to be healed by grief.

As I opened up about my grief, I found that there were others who would join me in that sacred space. Not looking to fix me, just those who wanted to sit with me, to comfort me in my sadness. People who would listen to what I was saying, and to what I didn’t say. People who offered practical help when I asked, and even when I couldn’t ask.

I found that when I pulled my grief in close, it had less power over me. I felt less guilt about mourning various losses because I recognized that grief was not my enemy. I experienced less shame as I realized that I had a right to grieve losses, even if they were gains for others. By becoming more open about bereavement and leaning into grief, I was able to find hope, both from outside sources and from within me.

We will all experience loss at some point in our lives. We can try to run from it. We can try to fight it. We can try to numb it. We can try to heal from it.

Or we can embrace it. And we can be healed by it.

****

Alise Chaffins is a wife, mother, eater of soup, and defender of the Oxford comma. She writes about life and grief, and how embracing grief allows for a fuller life. You can follow her online on Facebook and Twitter. She blogs regularly atknittingsoul.com.

Her book Embracing Grief: Leaning Into Loss to Find Life is now available.

10882166_10153254151256236_2538353269669151152_n

Miscarriage and the Confusion of Sinful Grief: A Response

 

I stumbled upon an article entitled Miscarriage and the Confusion of Sinful Grief that was posted at the Reformed Christian website “The Gospel Coalition”.

Jamie Carlson (who recently miscarried) wrote the post as a reflection on sin and grief.  Here’s a quick except from her post:

After my miscarriage, it hit me—grieving and sinning go together. Perhaps the most confusing and ongoing part of miscarriage recovery was fighting temptation and rooting out the sins laid bare by suffering. Grief came as expected, but the intensity of emotions made it so difficult to distinguish temptation and sin from grief that I was paralyzed—unable to move forward toward healing.

Jamie continues by stating that soon after she miscarried, a number of her friends started announcing their pregnancies.  She classifies her reactions of jealousy, annoyance, anger and minimization to such announcements as “sin”, as something inherently wrong.

Part of me is sensitive to Jamie’s situation.  My wife and I often experienced similar feelings of jealousy after we came to the realization that we were infertile.  It was hard to share in another person’s pregnancy announcement when we knew we could never conceive.

And while I respect Jamie and her attempt to overcome her feelings of jealousy and anger towards other expecting mothers, I think it should be made absolutely clear that grief is NEVER inherently wrong.

As much as I disagree with Jamie’s basic idea that “sinning and grieving” go together, we should understand that we DO stupid things when we grieve.  And there ARE healthy ways to grieve and unhealthy ways to grieve.  Not every response to grief is good.  Not every way of handling grief is healthy.

But the conversation becomes really convoluted when we shift our talk about grieving from “healthy grief vs. unhealthy grief” to Jamie’s language that points to “holy grief vs. sinful grief.”

Healthy grief is always messy, disorganized, and full of new, raw emotions.  Healing a wound involves blood, scabs, stitches, bandages and other less desirable devices.  Same with healing from grief (although I’m not sure we ever really heal from grief).  There are healthy ways of healing a wound and there’s unhealthy ways.  To think, though, that those unhealthy ways are sinful only adds another burden to the already burdened soul of the bereaved.

Associating grief with sin encourages our strong tendency for people to hid their grief.  It’s culturally normal for us to repress our thoughts, our tears, our emotions to the detriment of our healing.  Imagine how much more we’d repress our thoughts, our tears, our emotions if we thought such things were boarding sinful?

Grief must be shared.  It must be talked about.  And it should never be hidden like it’s some ugly sin.

I hope Jamie finds healing.  And I hope she finds friends who let her share her very normal, very human and very messy grief.

 

 

When you Only Find a Piece of Your Loved One

 

Just like the life cycle feeds off of death, so does the news cycle. Anything that has a degree of tragedy usually finds its way onto the national and/or international news. In principle, many of us realize that “if it makes the news, we don’t have to worry about it” (because the news is by definition exceptional), but unfortunately the news ends up normalizing tragic deaths, causing us to have unreasonable fears.

The reality is very much the opposite. Most deaths are not tragic. Most are decent, respectful, good and natural deaths. Most dying processes allow for family and friends to say “Good-bye”. And most die at a good age. It’s easy to forget that the life expentancy in the United States is nearly 79 years. While we can’t say for certain that those 79 years were all good years, we can say that the vast majority of deaths occur at a later stage of life, after much of living has already taken place.

The normal death is usually a good death.

But when tragedies like Kogalymavia Flight 9268 occur and the 224 passengers are killed, it’s hard for tragedies not to cloud our view.

There’s some definable characteristics that make a death tragic. Suddenness, intense pain in dying, a death that happens in one’s youth, an accidental death, etc. are all characteristics that can make a death particularly tragic. Another factor is dismemberment.

If the deceased’s body is never found, it’s a tragic death that too often inspires unresolved grief; a double wammy of losing a loved one and never being able to properly say good bye to the physical representation. A dismembered body is often a dismembered grief.

I’m often noticed how important it is for families just have the solace of knowing the body, or even a piece of the body of their loved one has been found.  It offers some degree of peace, some degree of knowledge that their loved one is indeed dead.  A missing body seems to produce an unresolved grief, where the question always seems to exist: “Did he/she survive?  Are they still out there?”  Accepting the death of a missing loved one is made that much harder when the there isn’t a physical dead body to provide that visual wake-up call.

When I see tragedies like Flight 9268 and the incredibly intricate process of determining remains (as small as they may be), I’m again reminded of the healthiness of viewing the body of the deceased.  Please understand, I’m not necessarily promoting embalming, but I am saying that the value of seeing the deceased at some point seems to provide a legitimate psychological aid in death acceptance.  Part of the reason that cremation can be unhealthy is that there’s times when we don’t get to see the deceased as dead.  The body is whisked away to the crematory never to be seen again.  There’s value in making that extra effort to see a loved one as dead.

When I consider the families of those lost in this most recent plane crash, I both recognize how tragic it is and I’m slightly thankful that I’ve been privileged to see the bodies of my loved one.

What does is say about us? On the Live Murder of Reporter Alison Parker and Photographer Adam Ward

 

kjdf

I admit it. I watched the video. Both videos. I watched the live feed that was broadcast on TV. And I watched the murderers’ video that he would later upload after he murdered Alison Parker and Adam Ward.

Both videos were horrific. Both were extremely sad.

After watching them, I found myself asking “why?”. “Why did I watch the videos of Alison and Adam’s murder?” It says something about me. It says something about us that the video would find its way onto nearly every major news feed and that millions of people were compelled to watch a tragic murder unfold.

But, I’m not entirely sure what it says about us.

We’re all intrigued by death, especially the tragic kind. We want to see what a real life shooting looks like. Does it REALLY look like the stuff we see in the movies, with Dexter-like blood spatter flying everywhere and the victims shouting in agony? Do the murderers engage in an angry soliloquy before taking the lives of their victims?

There’s a healthy tension between the sacred and spectacle of death.   Death is sacred because it’s a very personal chapter in a person’s (and family’s) narrative; but it’s a spectacle because many of us have the desire to funeralize in a public forum. Most deaths tend towards a sacred, private sphere, while some deaths – like the death of Michael Jackson, Whitney Huston, Heath Ledger, Kurt Cobain, Robin Williams, etc., etc., etc. – have such a sweeping public dimension that families and friends are left grasping for privacy amidst the spectacle.

This sacredness of death is the reason so many of us hate the Westboro picketers, who picket the funerals of fallen soldiers, and any other funeral that can grab them some limelight. We dislike what they’re doing because it transgresses one of the most sacred aspects of both our love and our humanity: the grief that comes from the loss of personal love.

Today, broadcast before the world, we witnessed the deaths of Alison Parker and Adam Ward. That is, after all, what the murderer wanted. He wanted his anger and his hatred to steal away the privacy of two individuals, robbing them of a sacred death and instead making their deaths entirely into a spectacle.

He did it.

I bought into it.

We bought into it.

We now know Alison Parker and Adam Ward as the people who were murdered on live TV.

What does it say about me? What does it say about us?

Perhaps it says that “death as spectacle” has become normalized. Perhaps it says that we’ve been robbed of the sacredness of death. Perhaps the death voyeurism that we’re constantly feed by the media, by video games and movies has caused us to move death out of the realm of the sacred and into spectacle. Perhaps we’re more used to death as spectacle than death as sacred.

Go to Top